NLIC.org

Terri Said:

I have been falsely accused of child medical neglect by my ex, what can I do?

We Answered:

Your name coupled with you being accused of child neglect convinces me you're a typlical liberal douche from the Pacific Northwest. Those people are idiots. They'll live in a tree from a month to save some stupid owl from losing its nest, but don't give a crap about people.

Tina Said:

just got out of college and unemployed. need short-term temporary insurance?

We Answered:

If you are looking for short term i work at state farmand it has a pretty good rate i can do a quote for you if you'd like

Terry Said:

how much do full dental veneers cost?

We Answered:

Oh man. If you're that concerned about your teeth, get it done right, through your insurance company at a good dentist. Not saying your uncle is bad. I think it would be cheaper here.

Veneers might crack and break over time. You probably won't be able to bite into food with them - like apples. Veneers are placed on the front of the tooth only. So, they might have a lip that hangs over your natural teeth, causing them to fall off.

You'd be better off getting crowns - they will cover the whole tooth (front and back). They will last longer too.

50% is great for insurance to cover. Think if it was none. I would say it's about $1000 per tooth. For either crown or veneer.

I'm getting two crowns - my insurance covers 50%. I pay $843 for my half. In Seattle. That's for both teeth.

I'd plan on saving $500 per tooth.

Eva Said:

If it is mandatory for all who drive to have car insurance, homeowners to have insurance...why should healthc?

We Answered:

.A few points: most likely others have had similar thoughts.

When I moved to DC in the early 19602, there was an "Uninsured Drivers Insurance Pool" that people paid something like $95 for 1 year, which they paid for when they renewed their car registration: they either had to prove that they had car insurance OR they paid 'The Pool' fee and THEN they got their car registration stickers.

Given the rate of inflation in the past 45 years since then, I'd say that $20 per week for an "Uninsured Health Insurance Pool" would be more than fair for an employee to 'contribute,' plus an amount of $50 to $80 per week from the employER, since that would somewhat closely resemble the 30-70 or 20-80 co-payment structure that employers who provide health insurance usually for it. People should be able to go to any hospital at any time for whatever reason, see the doctor of their choice, choose from a menu of options and companies. We already carry a driver's license, at LEAST one credit card, a car insurance card, a medical insurance card: what's the big deal about another medical insurance card?

WHAT ARE PEOPLE SO AFRAID OF????????????????
.

That would make, at the high end of revenue for the pool, $5,000 per year per employee. And since Workman's Comp already covers on-the-job injuries, etc., that $100/week will likely go unused for the most part. The over-age, or surplus, would accumulate in 'The Pool' and keep growing, just as it did in Medicare, because of the vast sums initially collected that were not used much until the system became widespread and functional. THAT'S WHY the Medicare, Social Security and Federal Highway Trust funds have been systematically raided over the past several decades, left with multiple IOUs instead of funds. Otherwise, Medicare would be ROLLING in dough. (SocSec and the Highway Trust would be replete with cash, too: those funds were the 'lender of last resort' when bonds didn't sell or OTHER IOUs had to be paid.)

Car registration and driver's license fees are too low. It SHOULD be expensive to drive. It SHOULD cost a prospective driver the time and money to take and pass a STRICT driving school course. In Germany, it costs THOUSANDS of dollars for a license, which is granted only AFTER passing strict exams on paper and behind the wheel.

When I lived in Maryland, the State ran its own monopoly of State-inspection stations for emissions. Cars were checked every-other year (There was a LOT of resistance to the yearly checks which was the original plan, so after just a year or two, they went to every two years). I forget the fee, but it was between $35 and $50, if I recall correctly. It took less than 10 minutes and there were always cars waiting in line to be checked, even with 2 or 3 open-and-working service bays. Without a 'smog cert' you couldn't re-register your car (same with having insurance; that's where California loses out not only on revenues, but also from increasingly older, less-efficient vehicles on the road: in California, you get the car 'smogged' when you buy it. Period. Private, licensed 'smog stations' charge $50-$100 for a smog check. The state gets a few dollars of tax. And there are NO 'vehicle inspection' stations in California, private or otherwise; as a result, there are a lot of semi-unsafe wrecks on the road, especially trucks.)

Nobody likes taxes, but at least we ought to be able to have more a tangible feel to the benefits we receive, but they are there, if we think about it: we have the world's best and one of the biggest Armed Forces in the entire world, very technologically advanced; our mail gets delivered every day but Sunday; firehouses and police stations are well-scattered in most cities and towns; our gas, electric and water are reliable ans safe; courts function relatively well, albeit seemingly heavily weighted in favor of the rich and the famous; our transit systems are mostly adequate and punctual.

Is life perfect and 100% guaranteed safe? No way. Close? I think so. Government isn't supposed to make money, but I would hope that other than defense, which is a total loss (except to the contractors) monetarily, programs would be revenue-neutral; or in the case of the Bureau of Engraving, which pays about 3 cents to produce a bill of paper money (it costs the same to produce a $1 bill as it does to produce a $100 bill) and sells them to The Treasury for almost face vale, their over-age goes to pay down the National Debt.

There are many sources of revenue for governments which, in turn, can fund beneficial programs for all citizens while not being unnecessarily burdensome. That's where our vote comes in. I wonder how many complainers are the ones who just didn't bother to vote.
.

Kimberly Said:

Life Insurance Objections Part Two.?

We Answered:

15) I know u are very busy, but our product can help you to increase your value by using time. The earlier you start , the more beneficial it will be to you and your family

16) Eventhough children are not the breadwinner but any unfortunate incident can cause a fortune. (ie premanent disability or death).

17)Yeap, mr custumoer you are absolutely right ! Do you know that even with a return of 20% per annum right know, how much do you think you can invest with me? The morale is not many people can accumulate money. It takes time and a good saving habit. So Life insurance gives you a systematic way to accumulate$$$ + protection. The day u sign up you already create an immediate estate of 1,000,000. How long do u think u can have 1,000,000 mr customer?? So by saving 1,000 per annum you can get 10,000% return of investment , which funds can give you such a high return???

18)

19) Mr customer if today u dun have a budget of 100 per month, if a disaster strike can u afford 100,000 ? think about it. Insurance is to cover the "Just In Case" factor.

20) All people have huge expenses, but remember this
expenses won't go away overnight, if today u can't work your current expenses will not go away but you or your family will suffer because of your poor planning. by just putting away 2 dollar a day you can have 500,000 protection. (2 dollar is only a cup of latte)

21) Next week may not come. I need to see you now as I have a real incident of my prospect died in accident. I feel extremely bad that i did not underwrite him ASAP. never delay or procastinate sir, u are doing a noble job by getting people insured!



from

loihl@einsuran.com
Malaysia Insurance Portal