NLIC.org

Lawrence Said:

Will Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox sue so that we won't be forced to buy insurance?

We Answered:

Great Question! Good Point! We'll show these Bozo's in November!

Lauren Said:

Need help with the last few of my economics review. Help?!?

We Answered:

1. a
2. b
3. a (I think)
4. d
5. d
6. c
7. b
8. a

Good luck on the exam!!

Samantha Said:

help with pennfoser consumer math, part 3?

We Answered:

12) I don't know, but I would go with A
14) b
16) c
18) Not c, probably not d since "term" is a kind of life insurance. So, A or B
20) D

Delores Said:

For those who still promulgate the notion that the "wage gap" is a product of a misogynistic culture...?

We Answered:

There is a mild flaw in your hypothetical scenario... Allow me to enlighten.

Feminists have proven that when they employ people - they put women in superior positions over men, but more commonly only employ women. So this hypothetical scenario is simply not comprehendable to a feminist as it involves mentally conjuring the idea of 'equality' in the initial stage of employment seeking.

For example, let's look at Harriet Harman - the 'equality minister' of England and a feminist.

A year back, she advertised a job.

Several men applied as did several women.

On the shortlist, one of the men clearly won-out. He had many more points in his favour. Harriet, being a feminist, did not like this - and so employed the less qualified woman who came in #2 on the shortlist.

By doing this, not only had she broke the law, she had demonstrated feminist definitions of 'equality' and hatred for men.

A side note worth mentioning, a year after she had been sued by the man for discrimination, she began pushing for a law that prohibited 'white men' (her words) from suing a company for discrimination. It almost looks as if she is trying to protect herself (and her sisters) in the future who seem to be planning on regularly discriminating against white men.

Take any feminist organisation, and you will see - it is almost guaranteed to be 99% women in the top positions of these organisations. Yet more proof that feminism is based on sexism against men, not 'equality' as they like to pretend.

Catherine Said:

Should the Federal Government provide Universal Car Insurance?

We Answered:

Some states get involved to help people get insurance who otherwise couldn't afford it.

Here in California, as I'm sure elsewhere, between 1/3 and 1/4 of all drivers don't have insurance. This is even though you can't renew your driver's license or your car registration without proving that you have insurance.

One plan that's been suggested is to put a 10-cent tax per gallon on gas, and this would give everyone a minimum liability coverage. If you wanted more coverage, or collision or comprehensive, you could buy it, but it would be cheaper because you wouldn't need 'uninsured motorist' protection. The article I read about this showed how this system would actually be better for everyone! It also suggested that visitors to the state who had their own insurance could keep track of their gas purchases and apply for a refund when they left (but I doubt many people would do that).

Health insurance is different from car insurance, though. When 45 million Americans simply can't afford health insurance, it's time for the govt. to step in. The comparison to car insurance is not a good one.

I am diabetic and my wife has a kidney transplant, and we are both middle-aged. If we had to buy our own insurance we simply couldn't afford it. If one of us didn't have a job that carried insurance, we would have to go on welfare because our insurance would cost most of what we make! We have gotten quotes as high as $4500/mo. for both of us. Maybe you think we just don't -deserve- insurance.